If there is one thing you can say about enemies, it is that they are more similar to each other than they are different.
Yes, Saddam is crazy but so is Bush. There is no stopping either of them as evidenced in Bush's flagrant disregard for a UN resolution and backing. If I may respectfully suggest to the War Crimes Tribunal, that both of them be tried for war crimes at the end of this war, if we see the end of this war.
Bush claims that the UN has failed to do it's job, but that does not rationally lead to the conclusion that the US is in a position to step in and play God to the lives and fates of Iraqis. Is it really suicidal for the US to wait for a UN resolution? If 30 days isn't going to make a difference, shouldn't waiting and letting the UN inspectors do their jobs be a priority?
Bush has played this war out as a "you're either with us or against us" scenario. Well, I'm with neither. There are more shades of gray in life than this black and white picture he has painted. His reasoning for war has been faulty, and his ties to corporate magnets who stand to gain from this war is just too coincidental for me to believe that he is truly being fair and objective about this war. As a good friend of mine said, that's what you get for letting an MBA run the country. Yes, this is truly what we get.
Have been reading some of the pro-war blogs lately. They all seem to say one thing, that war is a moral action. And that this moral action will beget a moral conclusion. Years and years and years of history have not proved this. If we know one thing about wars, it is that the outcome is never the way you expected it to be. No one wins, no one is vindicated, no one really gains absolution. Some pro-war blogs chide France for choosing to use it's veto powers and label them ingrates. Since Americans liberated them from the Germans, they should therefore be grateful to the US and join forces with them. Well, vive la France I say, for making a stand and thinking for itself. Vive la France, for not reminding the Americans that it was the French who liberated the US from the British and not asking that Americans pay back this debt. Other pro-war blogs claim that this is a holy war, like the one Joan of Arc fought, like the one that Angel Gabriel fought on behalf of God. It is time for Christians to liberate the Israel and the Muslim world. Well then, the 15 Saudis who flew planes into the WTC had every right to do so, since they were waging a holy war too... albeit a Muslim Holy War. If I may also add one more point, in the time of the crusades, it was the Muslims who liberated the Jews from the hands of the Christians. Maybe it's time the Jewish people paid this debt back.
One woman, in her blog, was proud of her brother and brother in law being in the army and serving their country by being in Iraq. Yes, am proud of them too. But pride is all that you can feel sitting in the comforts of your own home, watching CNN. Not the pain, not the fear, not the smell of mustard gas, or bodies on the streets,not the vision of your your peers shot dead in front of you. Wait til your brother, father, husband comes home in a body bag. Tell me, what good was war to you? If you are watching CNN tonight, and perhaps feeling really really proud of the American soldiers in Iraq, and maybe also feeling a little gung ho about the war, here are the eternal words of Wilfred Owen:
If in some smothering dreams, you too could pace
Behind the wagon that we flung him in
And watch the white eyes writhing in his face
HIs hanging face, like a devil's sick of sin.
If you could hear at every jolt, the blood come gargling
From the froth corrupted lungs
Obscure as cancer, bitter as the cud
Of vile, incurable sores on innocent tongues--
My friend you would not tell with such high zest
To children ardent for some desparate glory
The old lie,
Dulce et decorum est, pro patria mori.
There is no such thing as a just war, quick war, holy war. Wage peace, please.